Most data used for analytics has been transformed and integrated from multiple source datasets. This process of data transformation leads to inaccuracies in your analytics data. When transforming a source dataset into a target dataset, you are sure that they are not equivalent. Worse yet, is the fact that both datasets are isolated silos and cannot be joined to compare and audit the results. You should not trust data that you can not directly validate. The following list provides several reasons not to trust your analytics data:
Providing identical source datasets to ten different data teams will result in ten different integrated datasets. Beyond this, there is no way to audit or validate the data transformation, as the sources and the results are mathematically incongruent. When users familiar with the original data observe discrepancies in the integrated dataset, they lose confidence in its reliability.
With data integration methods, the metadata and data content of source datasets are transformed which unintensionally corrupts the dataset. With directly interoperable datasets, the source datasets are copied without altering the metadata and data content of source datasets. Each source dataset copy is enhanced with Data Compatibility Standards, which incorporate standardized dataset functionality into each dataset. As a result, the enriched datasets are universally interoperable and characterized as analytics-ready modular plug-and-play datasets. These modular datasets spontaneously form a distributed data fabric with end-to-end data integrity enforcement. Therefore, all the modular datasets are related and their data content can be validated and audited. The entire fabric conformes to the FAIR data principles and is composed of trustworthy data. This distributed data fabric becomes the universally interoperable data foundation upon which advanced data fabric components can be formed.